top of page

On endorsing someone’s research.

Writer's picture: Jason ThatcherJason Thatcher

An author recently sent me a note asking me to endorse or promote their paper.


I was puzzled.


I don’t know the author very well & the paper appeared in a lightly edited journal (e.g., I’m not sure it was vigorously vetted).


I was really bothered because the paper has strong prescriptive & normative implications for what is good research.


So, I sent a polite response & opted not to share it.


I mentioned this decision to a friend. We had an exchange about what it would take for me to endorse a paper.


On the one hand, I rarely post about academic papers. I tightly focus my feed on academic life - from my point of view.


This is a deliberate choice, bc I’m not out to be an academic kingmaker.


On the other hand, I de facto endorse papers that I manage in the peer review process, when my name as an editor appears at the beginning or end of a paper.


I’ll even post a link to it, bc I believe the paper is pretty good. Having accepted it, I think it’s important to stand behind the paper’s quality.


But the request & conversation made me think more about when to endorse a paper.


This is important bc in a world of digital traces, your endorsements become part of your digital portmanteau - eg, how you are perceived.


What to consider?


First, are you sharing a paper in public or private?


Posting a paper is great to an online audience should be done with caution.


Unless you have read it carefully, and know the authors, I would really think about endorsing the paper.


If it is in private, it’s less problematic.


When sharing note how well you know the paper & offer a boundary condition or two (eg, is this interesting?).


Second, are you sharing an opinion? A report? A method? Or a research paper?


Opinion pieces should be read carefully before sharing. Authors often slip in gems that only a careful reader will notice. Those gems can get you in trouble.


A report usually summarizes a non-scientific study by a company or association. Often, they are based on weak or summary evidence.


Note my comment on gems above - reports are usually written to promote a worldview that aligns with the authors - make sure the report reflects your worldview.


A method paper describes an advance that discredits or shows the utility of an analytic approach. Everyone knows this is a rapidly moving space. So try to share current papers. If not, call it a classic.


A research paper reports analysis of data or a concept. While the results are bound by time, it’s helpful to say why you endorse it; even if it’s just because your friend wrote it.


Third, is it an endorsement or a congratulations?


Endorsement implies that you agree. This should be done carefully.


Congrats or likes are simpler. It’s celebrating someone’s success.


Am I overthinking? Perhaps.


But. how we present ourselves & our thoughts online now receives scrutiny, esp. on the job market. it’s good to take care to think through who and what you endorse.


Best of luck.


 
 
 

Comments


  • Linkedin
bottom of page